TechReckoning: Mapping Macrobes
Thursday, September 18th, 2008
From The Ecologist (20/08/08) http://www.theecologist.org/pages/archive_detail.asp?content_id=1929
Mapmaking and conquest has a disturbingly close history. As indigenous people learned, the innocuous mapmaker may be followed by weapons, property claims and exploitation. So too for the recent rash of science projects using mapping.
The mapping of the human genome was accompanied by a massive patent grab on human genes. By mapping online social networks, internet marketers exploit new markets, while Big Pharma waits hungrily for new maps of the brain to offer opportunities to sell mood, attention, sleep and memory drugs.
The Human Microbiome Project is a $115 million attempt to map genetically all the microbes (bacteria, yeast and other single-celled critters) that inhabit the human body. Initial studies suggest our skin is crawling with a trillion microbes. Our mouths sustain 700 different microspecies, 10 billion in every gob of spit. The human gut harbours 100 trillion micro-organisms. Microbes outnumber the cells of the body 10 to one.
What interests microbial mapmakers is that our resident microbes (our so-called ‘microbiome’) are not getting a free ride. The body employs microbes to break down food, ward off invaders and boost immunity. Researchers estimate 10 per cent of all the body’s chemicals are produced by microbes. Over history, microbes have swapped genes with the body and become inheritable mitochondria in its cells. Most worrying are suggestions that our microbial passengers help control our behaviour. One tiny parasite, Toxoplasma gondii, secretes chemicals that make mice fatally attracted to cats. It is controversially suggested the same bug also brings on human behaviour patterns such as promiscuity and violence.
Waiting in the wings are a handful of business plans to exploit knowledge of the human microbiome, from the probiotic yoghurt industry to biotech companies like Florida-based Oragenics, which is going through FDA approval for genetically engineered bacteria it claims will out-compete the species that cause tooth decay. It calls this approach ‘replacement therapy’ – replacing an existing microbiome with a new engineered one. Leading researchers in the human microbiome project have filed a patent on a method they claim could make fat people skinny (or vice versa) by replacing the energy-efficient microbes resident in obese people with the more sluggish microbes found in leaner folks.
Most significant is the emerging evidence that everyone has a different set of microbes – a microbiomic fingerprint. Pharmaceutical companies and food companies would like to sell you drugs and foods perfectly matched to your own personal bacteria. Forensics experts would like to find out where you have been and with whom by examining the microbes you breathed in or left behind.
Most intriguing, because microbial populations in the air may differ by geographical location, a breath sample may reveal whether you have been taking the mountain air in Northern California or Northern Afghanistan. Instead, mapping and controlling microbes may become interchangeable with tools mapping and controlling human populations.
Jim Thomas is a research programme manager and writer with ETC group (www.etcgroup.org)





Comment left by: Jason Bobe
October 9th, 2008 at 8:05 pm
Hi Jim -
The article is informative, but I’m trying to understand the last sentence here: “Instead, mapping and controlling microbes may become interchangeable with tools mapping and controlling human populations.”
This sentence is, honestly, unhelpful to those of us that are interested in mapping our own microbiomes, yet would like to become informed about the possible risks of doing so.
Do you have any specific risks you can share?
Thanks very much,
Jason
Comment left by: jimt
October 10th, 2008 at 2:19 pm
Hi Jason,
Yes- I see your point – that was the result of trying to keep within a word limit for an article. The concern I was pointing at was that of states and other powerful players using microbiomic sampling to track people’s movements and associations. Imagine that you could, using metagenomic analysis, find a sort of genomic ‘fingerprint’ describing microbial populations in different locations and you can then identify that ‘fingerprint’ in the microbiomes of people who have travelled to that place. you would be developing a tool for surveillance authorities to work out where people have been. It could be a method of tracking dissidents.
jim
Comment left by: Jason Bobe
October 10th, 2008 at 5:57 pm
Interesting concept, but I’m not sure this scenario is technically feasible or likely. A person who grabs a public door knob will acquire microbes from places they have never visited, etc. Microbes move around, as people do. Any microbial signature of a geographic location is also likely to change, like the weather, which means its not uniquely identifying (as a fingerprint is). I’ll ask around and what others think.
Thanks,
Jason